I have a question regarding the use of Russian in informal writings; it relates to spelling. I've been reading lots of Russian language LJ's and noticed that some people spell words not as they should be spelt, though this is done on purpose.
For example, фторник instead of вторник, вотка instead of водка, умнайо instead of умное, etc. etc. Also alot of swear words in particular are written like that, but I won't mention them here obviously.
Mostly I think it's the younger peeps that write like that, but it doesn't make sense to me. It's not like it takes less effort to write the words like that, but it almost looks like they're writing the words how they sound.
So, someone who's in the know please explain.
Much appreciated!! :))
For example, фторник instead of вторник, вотка instead of водка, умнайо instead of умное, etc. etc. Also alot of swear words in particular are written like that, but I won't mention them here obviously.
Mostly I think it's the younger peeps that write like that, but it doesn't make sense to me. It's not like it takes less effort to write the words like that, but it almost looks like they're writing the words how they sound.
So, someone who's in the know please explain.
Much appreciated!! :))
no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 02:08 pm (UTC)As for me, I use it too ^.^ But i don't speak this style, i just use single words.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 02:49 pm (UTC)Just checking, because I did find the former in the dictionary.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 02:53 pm (UTC)подонки
Date: 2007-01-21 03:00 pm (UTC)Re: подонки
Date: 2007-01-21 04:02 pm (UTC)Научный креатифф
Date: 2007-01-21 04:39 pm (UTC)Perhaps, an instance of the "youth culture" phenomenon we see almost everywhere.
Here's a recent Vedomosti article that treats the subject.
http://www.vedomosti.ru/newspaper/article.shtml?2006/12/15/117693
Re: Научный креатифф
Date: 2007-01-21 05:51 pm (UTC)Re: Научный креатифф
Date: 2007-01-21 06:10 pm (UTC)http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AF%D0%B7%D1%8B%D0%BA_%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2
Re: Научный креатифф
Date: 2007-01-21 06:19 pm (UTC)this guys just act like its usual dialect. every word of kashenit/padonkofski style can be traced right to its author.
the dialect itself were not created by a bunch of ignorant kids as it might seem. There were some smart guys behind it.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 02:50 pm (UTC)Just checking, because I did NOT find the former in the dictionary.
Re: Научный креатифф
Date: 2007-01-21 05:51 pm (UTC)i just tried to point out roots of padonkofski dialect. it evolves aswell.
Re: Научный креатифф
Date: 2007-01-21 05:56 pm (UTC)Re: Научный креатифф
Date: 2007-01-21 06:03 pm (UTC)Во многих случаях неоправданно ставится знак равенства между «языком падонкаф» и более специфичным диалектом, породившим лексику в стиле «превед».
далее тут http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AF%D0%B7%D1%8B%D0%BA_%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2
Re: Научный креатифф
Date: 2007-01-21 07:12 pm (UTC)As they say, "Some make history, some write history".
P.S. The point that "падонкаффский" itself is evolving demonstrates that it, too, is subject to the same laws of nature as the standard language, i.e. "transmute or die."