A question to all *learners* of Russian: how are you taught to pronounce щ?
99.9% of Russians pronounce it, simply, as a long soft [sh], without the slightest trace of a [ch] at the end. The [shch] pronounciation isn't even "very formal" - it's practically obsolete. But as far as I know a lot of students are taught the old pronounciation. I guess it's a kind of pedantism per se with all professors who teach a language that's foreign to them.
Did You Know: the only Russian word of non-Slavic origin in which щ occurs is крещендо, from the Italian.
99.9% of Russians pronounce it, simply, as a long soft [sh], without the slightest trace of a [ch] at the end. The [shch] pronounciation isn't even "very formal" - it's practically obsolete. But as far as I know a lot of students are taught the old pronounciation. I guess it's a kind of pedantism per se with all professors who teach a language that's foreign to them.
Did You Know: the only Russian word of non-Slavic origin in which щ occurs is крещендо, from the Italian.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 01:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 02:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-07 10:15 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-08 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-08 09:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-08 09:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 04:14 am (UTC)i can't remember words it shows up in though
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 04:16 am (UTC)I notice that now my tongue pulls back a little bit too. *shrug*
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 08:01 am (UTC)In my class, we didn't spend too long on letter-pronounciation lessons, but mostly picked it up as we went along. The only time I remember my professor pointing it out was as in the letter in the name Krushchov. Generally, I'll say a щ pretty much as a ш, because that's how I've heard my (non-native) professor say it all the time.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 09:16 am (UTC)However, this was too hard, and I started pronouncing it "sh." No one corrected me. :)
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 11:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 02:56 pm (UTC)It's quite odd, when you see a book on Russian telling you to pronounce щ as in "fresh cheese", and the accompanying tape has a sound that has no trace of the 'т' (or the 'ч', if you think of it that way).
Still, when you think of the 5 'exceptional letters' ц ж ш ч щ, it seems clear that щ should be just the always-soft form of always-hard ш, which happens to have been graced with its own letter (of course, this is not conclusive evidence, but it made me suspicious of the usual teaching of щ).
[Unfortunately, I have now mastered the unauthentic pronunciation, and have grow n quite attached to it. I even had a sort of a dream last night about the sound-symbol complex 'shch-щ' (slightly synaesthesic)... :)]
So, does the softness of щ mean it's pronounced somewhat like a lengthened form of the (voiceless) alveolar-palatal fricative? That's ɕ in IPA (assuming you have an unicode font with a glyph for U-0x0255), /s\/ in the X-SAMPA representation of IPA, "s" with an acute accent in Polish (I think), and "x" in the pinyin representation of Mandarin Chinese... :)
Another thing: I've often noticed that when teachers of a language insist on something that isn't true, the native speakers often believe it too, even when it is clearly wrong. After all, it's hard to analyse your own language, especially when you've been told authoritatively (but not always correctly) how it works at school, and from 'folk linguistics'.
So, do Russians think of щ as being "shch"?
Спасибо болшьой,
stephen
no subject
Date: 2003-06-07 08:02 am (UTC)it seems clear that щ should be just the always-soft form of always-hard ш, which happens to have been graced with its own letter
not quite. phonetically this is, of course, true, except for the fact that щ is not just always hard but also always doubled. щ matches the Proto-Slavic -tj- in words of Church Slavonic origin, otherwise it's the mutated (чередованная) form of the consonant groups -sk- and -st-, matched in Polish by szcz, in Czech by šť, and in Serbo-Croat by št. In the Bulgarian alphabet, щ actually stands for [шт]. there was certainly a time when the Russian щ was pronounced [shch], but that's history.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-08 09:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-09 03:19 pm (UTC)Actually, I'm pretty sure all the sounds I named above are more or less the same; at least that they would be given the same IPA symbol. But the IPA system only gives approximate coordinates; even within one IPA symbol there's scope for lots of variants (effected through, say tension of the tongue, exact point and shape of articulation, etc). Probably each of the sounds I mentioned above has a slightly different realisation...
s.
Re:
Date: 2003-06-09 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-05 05:48 pm (UTC)The pinyin x is a bad example, as even Chinese have no agreement on how to pronounce it =)
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 03:42 pm (UTC)You go for a "sh" sound, pause it for a millisecond and push the air again to make another short "sh" sound (the tongue is not moved between those two) and go for the "ch."
I can't say I've heard any Russkiys pronounce it as a long "sh."
Borshch - um...veggie broth soup? (I don't like the kind based on beets. Spinach or tomato base is better.)
Shchi - nasty cabbage soup :P
Shchuka - Pike fish
Khrushchov - Soyuz (union) leader that was on par with George W. for wits.
Tovarishch - Comrade
no subject
Date: 2003-06-07 07:41 am (UTC)said where? with all my respect to Odessa (my maternal grandfather was born there), the Russian spoken there is perhaps the single greatest fluctuation from the average.
I'm from Moscow and I've been pronouncing it as a doubled soft "sh" all my life, like everyone around me.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-07 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-08 02:04 am (UTC)crescendo - постепенное нарастание громкости
no subject
Date: 2003-06-07 10:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-08 02:06 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-08 09:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-08 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-08 02:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-08 02:05 pm (UTC)