Ударение

[olydiagron.livejournal.com]

.

Застрелянный
or
Застрелянный ?
To me the first option sounds best.

Posted via LiveJournal.app.

Comments

[oryx_and_crake]

First of all, it is застрелЕнный, not застрелЯнный (расстрелЯнный though - that's language logic for you). The stress cannot be on the same place as in the infinitive because in the infinitive it falls on the ending (застрелить). In general, I am not aware of such rule either. The stress is on the second syllable (застРЕленный).

[malim-praedari.livejournal.com]

ЗастрЕленный (note the spelling).

[shota-kitten.livejournal.com]

The first: застрЕленный. And there's e in the suffix, not я.

[lasve.livejournal.com]

ЗастрелЕнный.

[izlington.livejournal.com]

Russian and grammar rules do not get along )

[korollapushki.livejournal.com]

стрелЯть - стрЕляНый (= бывалый, видалый, видавший виды, многоопытный, опытный, матерый, ученый, умудренный опытом)

застрелИть - застрЕлеННый (= ликвидированный, убитый)

[janelight.livejournal.com]

Come on, they do ))

[janelight.livejournal.com]

ЗастрЕленный - е, not я.

[colonelrabin.livejournal.com]

Hahaha

http://www.gramota.ru/slovari/dic/?lop=x&bts=x&zar=x&ab=x&sin=x&lv=x&az=x&pe=x&word=%E7%E0%F1%F2%F0%E5%EB%2A%ED%ED%FB%E9

[olydiagron.livejournal.com]

My language logic says that the stress should be on the second syllable - if the word even exists... :-)
I don't know how to put a picture in a comment so i put it in the post. maybe I should stop reading this book - to many grammatical "strangeties". But it can hardly be misstakes, can it, it must be some stilistic approach of some sort?

At least I am comforted by the fact that when I react upon a word - there is actually something unusual about it :-). Means taht i have some language locic at least ;-).

[olydiagron.livejournal.com]

ë ?

[olydiagron.livejournal.com]

They do, it is like physics - the logic is too complex for the avarage human brain...

[janelight.livejournal.com]

))) Not that bad )) However, English is much easier in general )))

[janelight.livejournal.com]

No, it is not ))

[olydiagron.livejournal.com]

so the author is making a misstake? or is it a stilistic grip of some sort.

[olydiagron.livejournal.com]

not fo me :-( i don't have a clue about English grammar, but it is simular to swedish so people understand me anyway :-)

[janelight.livejournal.com]

Regarding the book - there is definetely a mistake in it. The editor was not good enough ))

[alien-svurm.livejournal.com]

what are you reading?

[olydiagron.livejournal.com]

So why is the author writing "zatrelyannyj"? (I put a picture of the page of the book in the post now).

[korollapushki.livejournal.com]

"оболочка (!!!) от медвежонка" and "три медведя...разбрелись (!!!) по столу" - you must (!) stop reading this book:)))

[olydiagron.livejournal.com]

You and the author Andrey Tirgenev are the only ones so far confirming the existence of that word... my confusion is total :-)

[janelight.livejournal.com]

Oh - from what I heard about Swedish, it is really complicated ))) Forget outsiders like English or Russian ))
By the way, Russian is closer to French in complexity. And it is interesting to meet French constructions in the classic Russian literature ))

[korollapushki.livejournal.com]

"застрелЯнный" is a grammatical mistake

[korollapushki.livejournal.com]

mistake, grammatical mistake - we never say "оболочка от медвежонка" and "фигурки разбрелись по столу"

also there are punctuation mistakes :)

[olydiagron.livejournal.com]

"Spat' i verit' - blokadnyj roman" Andreja Turgeneva, v 2008 gody vyshla. Delo v tom chto kniga mne nravitsya... tam na samom dele malo pro Stalina I Kirova, v osnovnom tam leningradskij byt'. Pust' tam grammaticheskie strannosti - ja vsyo ravno do kontsa dochitayu, xochu znat' chto budet s Varenkoj, s Aleksandrom pavlovitjem i genriettoj davydovnoj... .-)